WWED?
What would Earl do?
I don't know if (as TBS announcers Brian Anderson & Ron Darling conjectured) Mike Matheny removed reliever Mitchell Boggs from the NL Wildcard Game amid the heavy precipitation of beer bottles* because he was concerned about Boggs' effectiveness after such a lengthy delay, but were I he, I would have been on the field laying ground work for a protest of the Cardinals' own.
*Most desired MLB reactions to debacle: 1) Eliminate the Wildcard Game and, thus, 2nd wildcard, 2) Return of the paper cup and paper-cup popping after games.
No matter how egregious you believe the invocation of the infield fly rule was -- once made -- the Cardinals should not have suffered any tactical disadvantage due to the delay at the hands of Braves' fans. The home team is responsible for providing a secure field.
In the case of intruders on the field (think expansion Senators' last game, not drunk-on-the-field) a forfeit can be declared after 15 minutes (Rule 3.18). Matheny went to change pitchers at about 12-13 minutes after debris started hitting the field. Before making that move, he should have gone to the plate ump and said "we're approaching 15 minutes, when do we move to forfeit?" He'd have been told that's not happening*. Where upon Matheny could state, "well, I'm at a disadvantage here, my pitcher's getting cold, how 'bout you start calling strikes every 30 seconds until their hitter's ready to get in the box?" (reaching for an application of 6.02d) Or as Earl would have stated, "I'm at a (bleep)ing disadvantage because of this horse(bleep). If you don't start calling (bleeping) strikes every (bleepedybleeping) 30 seconds, I'm protesting this (bleeping) game, this is horse(bleep)."
*Indeed now that no post-season game can end before 8-and-a-half innings, the ump-in-chief could not have forfeited the game -- but Matheny should asked just to plant the idea of the situation being a serious that could under normal circumstances move that way.
No protest has more than a .0001% chance of being upheld -- for a post-season game square that. But at least Matheny's protest would have been a protest about the application of the rulebook and the disadvantage that application put his team in. Gonzalez' was about a judgement call (unprotestable) or the timing of that call.
But here's the thing (as Rob Neyer inquired about tonight through twitter), the timing changed nothing. The runners were halfway because the fly was too shallow to tag. And if the infield fly was called before the ball had even peaked, they should have gone -- halfway because the ball was too shallow to tag.